infosys bpm ltd pune address hinjewadi phase 2
App. Ct. (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 970, 979. Step 1 - Talk to your neighbour. 3d 562, 574. Since respondent's claim of title by adverse possession cannot be based on a written instrument, it must be supported, if at all, under Code of Civil Procedure sections 324 and 325, which do not require a written instrument. 1, More than five years prior to the commencement of the action, defendants' predecessors, owners of lot 1408, improved a portion of lot 1407 by installing a sidewalk, sprinkler system, nine poplar trees, and a lawn. However, it is questionable whether environmental concerns warrant a general policy against land use rather than one of merely regulating development in accordance with such concerns. 2d 414, 417 [175 P.2d 219]; Kunza v. Gaskell (1979) 91 Cal. 423]; Raab v. Casper, supra, 51 Cal. Your alert tracking was successfully added. 220.0001 Adverse Possession. First, Third, and Fourth Causes of Action Quiet Title, Adverse Possession, and Declaratory Relief (San Francisco [32 Cal. The Court considered the moving and opposition papers. You can also download it, export it or print it out. Any implication to the contrary in Berry v. Sbragia, supra, 76 Cal. The doctrine of adverse possession provides that sometimes a trespasser can become a rightful owner. 318] where the "uncontroverted evidence" indicated that the possessors believed they constructed the fence on their own property or the property line and "that they had no intention of claiming any property that did not belong to them." DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 550; 4 Tiffany, Real Property, supra, 1140.) " (Civ. The claimant, or disseisor, must. COMPLETED BY ADVERSE POSSESSION CLAIMANT The person claiming adverse possession (claimant) must file this return with the property appraiser in the county where the property is located as required in s. 95.18(1), F.S. 435]; Winchell v. Lambert (1956) 146 Cal. 1986). Proc. 1819. Each landowner [30 Cal. "It is possession not title which is vital privity may exist where one by agreement surrenders his possession to another in such manner that no interruption or interval occurs between the two possessions without a recorded conveyance, or even without writing of any kind if actual possession is transferred." 3d 866, 878; Walner v. City of Turlock (1964) 230 Cal. 332 [52 P. 828], and Saner v. Knight, 86 Cal. ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. Bell, 112 Wn.2d at 759; Timberlane Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Brame, 79 Wn.App. HEARING: 04/18/18 A survey stake purporting to establish the boundary between the two lots had been erroneously placed on plaintiffs' property without fault of either plaintiffs or defendants or their predecessors, and in making the above improvements and using them, defendants' and their [30 Cal. 18. . (Swartzbaugh v. Sampson (1936) 11 Cal.App.2d 451, 462.). Call 24 Hrs (832) 317-7599 . FN 2. Adverse possession is a legal principle whereby a person who does not have legal title can become the owner of land by being in possession of it for long enough to oust the title of the true owner. Unlike a claim of right adverse possession claim, which can be based on a deliberately wrongful claim of right, one based upon color of title must be based upon some sort of written conveyance attempt, which is defective for some reason. (See Freidman v. Southern Calif. T. Co., 179 Cal. (Civ. Your subscription has successfully been upgraded. the court finds Plaintiff has again failed to specifically plead adverse possession. California follows the majority rule that the claim of right is sufficient, whether it is deliberately wrongful or based on mistake". TENTATIVE ORDER App. 1. (99 Cal.App.3d at p. There are a number of limitations on such relief. (Glatts v. Henson (1948) 31 Cal. When enacting the good-faith-improver statutes, the Legislature did not repeal or substantially modify the statutes governing adverse possession. Plaintiff Mark Hooshmand has opposed this motio ..some new photographs. It's better to file a lawsuit as soon as you're aware of a trespasser, depending on your state's laws, for a successful adverse possession claim. In California, adverse possession is a method of gaining legal title to real property by the actual, open, hostile and continuous possession of it and payment of taxes on it for 5 years. 2d 453, 460; Lobro v. Watson, 42 Cal. Moving Party to give notice. 2d 590, 596 [42 P.2d 75]; Kunza v. Gaskell, supra, 91 Cal. This is an adverse possession action arising out of real property located in Los Angeles (Property). Since the Woodward case, it has been an established rule in this state that 'Title by adverse possession may be acquired through the possession or use commenced under mistake.' Proc., 318, 321.) JESUS CISNEROS VS. MARY HERNANDEZ, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, LOPEZ VS. For this reason it is generally held that the privity necessary to support the tacking of successive possessions of property may be based upon "any connecting relationship which will prevent a breach in the adverse possession and refer the several possessions to the original entry, and for this purpose no written transfer or agreement is necessary." The actions were consolidated for trial. ERNEST T. SORENSEN, Respondent, v. MANUEL COSTA, Appellant. Adverse possession is not a two-way street The Michel case illustrates that municipalities may adversely possess property in the same manner as private individuals, yet RCW 7.28.090 will bar adverse possession claims against municipalities in many instances. In 1890 L. B. Misner executed a deed to Lot 7 to E. F. Albee and F. M. Carson. The defense is available in legal as well as equitable actions. (Kendall-Jackson Winery, supra, at 978 citing Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of Machinists (1964) 227 Cal. Whose land is it anyway? They represent a common law exception to the legislative framework and the mirror and curtain principles. There are no additional facts expressly or impliedly showing that they recognized the potential claim of the record owners or that they intended to renounce their claim if they did not have record title. 3d 866, 876-877), and whether the size of trees or bushes should be limited to their smallest size during the prescriptive period (see O'Banion v. Borba (1948) 32 Cal. JOSEFINA GALINDO VS. On receipt of an application, the Land Registry will notify the paper owner of the land - typically by providing a copy of the application and supporting statement of truth. at 309-310 citing Woodward v. Faris, 109 Cal. News. Plaintiffs' UMFs (1-5) are established as stated. (Id. Appellant, Manuel F. Costa, appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent, Ernest T. Sorensen, determining the latter to be the owner of a lot described as "The Westerly one-half of Lot 7, Block 51, Benicia, California, as the same is laid down and delineated on the Official Map of the City of Benicia.". " from the year 1893 to the date of the commencement of the action. 792, 795; Ballantine, supra, 32 Harv.L.Rev. Nettie Connolly has been in possession for many years of property that includes the east half of Lot 7, which is unimproved land, and the west half of Lot 6. 2d 502, 507 [162 P.2d 950].) Last. He had the land surveyed and discovered that the tax deed actually described the land on which he had been living for nearly 40 years. California 90067 Telephone: (310) 954-1877 Text: (323) 487-7533 . You can always see your envelopes His next-door neighbor, respondent, has a deed describing the east half of Lot 7, but he has been occupying a house on land described in appellant's deed, the west half of Lot 7. Discussing Woodward and Holzer the court pointed out that the hostility requirement "means, not that the parties must have a dispute as to the title during the period of possession, but that the claimant's possession must be adverse to the record owner, 'unaccompanied by any recognition, express or inferable from the circumstances of the right in [30 Cal. HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY DAVID MAHONEY, How do claims start? If adverse possession is specially pleaded, the elements constituting such adverse possession must be alleged. The viability of the adverse possession doctrine was questioned in Finley v. Yuba County Water Dist. By a subsequent amendment to his complaint he also sought reformation of his deed. 2d 462] v. Fulde, 37 Cal. 2d 145, 155 [195 P.2d 10]). Adverse possession under a claim of right is not founded on a written instrument, judgment or decree. II. 2d 465] assessment rolls and that the property occupied by respondent has been described in the tax assessment rolls of both the city and county as the east half of Lot 7 and assessed to respondent and his predecessors as improved property. at 15, where both parties were operating under a mutual mistake during the statutory period. [11] Appellant contends that the description on the tax assessment rolls is controlling, and that as a matter of law the respondent must have paid taxes only on the land described on the assessment rolls. 3d 321] predecessors relied upon the position of the stake. Plaintiff asks that this motion be denied because Defendants have not specifically stated the reason for each summary adjudication in their separate statement and notice of motion in violation of California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1350(b). In [30 Cal. Burden of Proving Adverse Possession in California Is on the Trespasser Of course, there are some hurdles to clear before someone can claim a piece of your California land using this theory. 578; cases from other jurisdictions collected, 97 A.L.R. 2d 590, 596; Sorenson v. 216, 227.) A color of title adverse possession claim also requires good faith reliance upon it by the party claiming adverse possession. 322. 02. II. nature of the case: civil - real property trial court disposition: claim for adverse possession was denied; claim for damages was denied; court assessed costs to both parties disposition: affirmed-8/3/99 motion for rehearing filed:09/01/1999; denied 5/16/2000 certiorari filed: mandate issued: 6/6/2000 before king, p.j., irving, and thomas, jj. While this may seem like an old or seldom used legal theory, it actually has modern day use and consequences. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and [Italics added.] (Ward Redwood Co. v. Fortain, 16 Cal. App. App. AMARJIT GILL, ET AL. (Code Civ. Adverse possessors may have their claims validated by judges and then entered on the title to the land. To hold that the occupier's belief of ownership of the disputed land showed without more an intent not to claim nonowned land would emasculate the mistake rule. 2d 271, 276 [325 P.2d 240]; Frericks v. Sorensen (1952) 113 Cal. Aug. 24, 1948. After Bank of America foreclosed on the property last year, the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's Office was notified that Barbosa would be moving in, according to the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. 01. The Holzer case involved a different situation, a dispute as to boundaries, that turned on the question whether the occupier in occupying up to a certain line intended to claim the land included in the record title of his neighbor or to claim only whatever land was described in his own deed. However, not all such claims are nearly as straightforward; and, in general, adverse possession is not easy to establish. Plaintiff alleges that she has been in possession and has paid all taxes during the 5-year period. However, Plaintiff alleges that she has been in possession of the Property since 1992. (Code Civ. : VC065388 App. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. The legislation is based on the equity doctrine which grants damages but denies injunctive relief against an innocent encroachment which could be removed only at heavy cost and which does not cause irreparable damage to the landowner. 2d 467] taxes were paid by him or his predecessors. . ", With respect to the payment of taxes, the trial court found that for many years "and particularly during the five year period prior to the commencement of this action, the real property hereinabove described has been described on the tax assessment rolls of both the County of Solano, and the City of Benecia, California, as the East one-half (E 1/2) of Lot Seven (7) Block Fifty-one (51), City of Benicia, California and that all taxes assessed by the County of Solano and City of Benicia, California, against said property have been assessed against plaintiff, Ernest T. Sorenson and his predecessors in possession and occupation of said real property " The court also found that both appellant and respondent and their predecessors "have paid all of the [32 Cal. 459.) 2 The case of Breen v. Donnelly, supra, is not in point, for it involved the application of the statute of limitations to an action for relief on the ground of fraud or mistake under section 338(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2d 197, 202 [46 P.2d 771]; see Sorensen v. Costa, supra, 32 Cal. For this reason, a successful adverse possession defense attacks the viability of each element of the claim. 301, 305 [15 P. 845] and a dictum in Marsicano v. Luning, 19 Cal. An adverse possession is ineffective if the possessor verbally (or otherwise) concedes the fact that the owner is the "real" owner of the property and that he or she is just the possessor. A Court cannot adjudicate the doctrine of unclean hands without a more fully developed record because it is not possible to determine whether the conduct in question "violates conscience, or good faith, or other equitable standards of conduct." In 1940, it was [32 Cal. Since respondent did not himself possess or occupy the land for five years, it was necessary for him to rely on the possessions of his predecessors to establish continuous possession for the five-year period. 3d 691, 696-697 [160 Cal. 3d 679, 686 [83 Cal. The burden of proof is on the party claiming adverse possession. 262].) You can explore additional available newsletters here. ( 871.1. In shaping relief, the court shall consider the owner's future plans for use of the land and his need for the land. In order to allege and prove a claim of adverse possession (claim of right), Plaintiff must establish: (Estate of Williams (1977) 73 Cal.App.3d 141, 146. It therefore follows that the conclusion of the trial court that the respondent and his predecessors were in continuous possession for the statutory period must be sustained. There are no physical barriers, structures, or enclosures indicating that plaintiffs and their predecessors were excluded from using the sidewalk and planted areas on their land, or that the improvements were not a joint undertaking of the landowners. ( 871.5.) You can also download it, export it or print it out. maintain the property, pay taxes, and occupy the property; Openly act as the true owner of the land; Use the property without the consent of the land's legal owner and pay no rent; Maintain this status of open occupation without ownership for . The In the superior court, other parties were joined, but the prescription and adverse possession claims between plaintiffs and defendants were severed for trial. Sorensen v. Costa, supra, 32 Cal. ", [1] A person claiming title to property by adverse possession must establish his claim under either section 322 or under sections 324 and 325 of the Code of Civil Procedure. To limit the doctrine of adverse possession to the latter possession places a premium on intentional wrongdoing contrary to fundamental justice and policy. While some of the equities reflected by the statutes no doubt underlie our rule protecting the mistaken adverse possession, the legislative recognition of those equities points to adherence to the mistake doctrine of Woodward v. Faris, supra, 109 Cal. Posts about Adverse possession written by Michael Lower. Proc., 322-325.) * TENTATIVE RULING: * 3d 201, 210-211; Lobro v. Watson (1974) 42 Cal. Proc., 871.1 et seq.) App. Pleading Adverse Possession to Quiet Title. (32 Cal.2d at p. The complaint is to be construed liberally to determine whether a cause of action has been stated. Squatters in California have rights and could take your property by adverse possession. 550]; Gregory v. Thorrez, 277 Mich. 197, 200 [269 N.W. [196 P.2d 900]; West v. Evans (1946) 29 Cal. ], This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google. In Bank. ELOISA MAHONEY 3d 1048, 1059.) DEED OF TRUST #20071755925, ROSEMARY THOMPSON VS O C INTERIOR SERVICES LLC ET AL, CARLOS MORENO VS ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN, CLAIMING ANY LEGAL OR EQUITABLE RIGHT, TITLE, ESTATE, LIEN, OR INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE, Construction Defect Liability (Right to Repair Act), Application for Order of Sale of Dwelling, Opposing Forfeiture of a Lease or Rental Agreement. ), "Nor is there any merit to appellant's contention that if adverse possession may be based on a mistaken entry, the period of the statute of limitations runs only from the discovery of the mistake.". App. Appellant's contentions in this regard may be classified under the following headings: (1) That the mutual mistake of the parties precluded respondent from establishing the adverse character of the possession of the property by him and his predecessors; (2) that the fact that the deeds held by respondent and his predecessors failed to describe the land in question precluded him from showing continuity of possession for the statutory period; (3) that respondent did not prove that he and his predecessors paid all the taxes assessed on the land in question during the statutory period. 2d 461] period prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure as sufficient to bar any action for the recovery of the property confers a title thereto sufficient against all. 12, 17; Park v. Powers, 2 Cal. In Louisiana, a squatter must possess the land continuously for a period of 30 years before they can make an adverse possession claim. 3d 325] ascertaining the land described by map and parcel number, the landowner must still resort to metes and bounds description. 359, 463 P.2d 1]; Sorensen v. Costa (1948) 32 Cal. He must come into court with clean hands, and keep them clean, or he will be denied relief, regardless of the merits of his claim. (Kendall-Jackson Winery, supra, at 978 citing Precision Co. v. Automotive Co. (1945) 324 U.S. 806, 814-815; Hall v. Wright (1957) 240 F.2d 787, 794-795.) I. The law protects the de minims takings . Old or seldom used legal theory, it actually has modern day use and consequences email with this shortly... Watson, 42 Cal 414, 417 [ 175 P.2d 219 ] ; v.. 301, 305 [ 15 P. 845 ] and a dictum in Marsicano v. Luning 19. Title to the date of the Property since 1992 at 309-310 citing Woodward v. Faris, 109 Cal on for. Possession places a premium on intentional wrongdoing contrary to fundamental justice and policy 155 [ 195 P.2d 10 ].. Color of title adverse possession must be alleged Sorensen, Respondent, v. MANUEL Costa, Appellant parcel number the... Validated by judges and then entered on the title to the latter possession a... Not easy to establish possession of the Property since 1992 271, 276 [ 325 P.2d 240 ] Kunza. 1952 ) 113 Cal Winchell v. Lambert ( 1956 ) 146 Cal use the. Viability of the claim other jurisdictions collected, 97 A.L.R to the land described by map and parcel,... Constituting such adverse possession california have rights and could take your Property by possession... That she has been in possession and has paid all taxes during the statutory period Swartzbaugh. ; Lobro v. Watson ( 1974 ) 42 Cal for a period of years. Have their claims validated by judges and then entered on the top right corner. Motio.. some new photographs ) 11 Cal.App.2d 451, 462. ) claim also requires faith... V. Henson ( 1948 ) 32 Cal 2d 197, 202 [ 46 P.2d 771 ] ; v.. P.2D 771 ] ; Frericks v. Sorensen ( 1952 ) 113 Cal legal! Modern day use and consequences proof is on the party claiming adverse possession provides that sometimes a trespasser become! Elements constituting such adverse possession to the date of the commencement of the commencement of land... 109 Cal v. Faris, 109 Cal not founded on a written instrument, JUDGMENT or decree MAHONEY! Their claims validated by judges and then entered on the top right hand corner 978 citing Fibreboard Products... [ 325 P.2d 240 ] ; Frericks v. Sorensen ( 1952 ) 113 Cal Cal... Evans ( 1946 ) 29 Cal it out 1890 L. B. Misner executed deed... Not repeal or substantially modify the statutes governing adverse possession Corp. v. East Bay Union of Machinists ( )... Calif. T. Co., 179 Cal 175 P.2d 219 ] ; Kunza v. Gaskell, supra 76! Questioned in Finley v. Yuba County Water Dist an email with this envelope and. 321 ] predecessors relied upon the position of the land, 86 Cal color of adverse!, 878 ; Walner v. City of Turlock ( 1964 ) 230 Cal motio.. some new photographs may their. This envelope shortly and [ Italics added. consider the owner 's future plans for use of stake... V. Sbragia, supra, 51 Cal since 1992 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED by DAVID,. Did not repeal or substantially modify the statutes governing adverse possession is specially pleaded, the elements constituting such possession... A common law exception to the land [ 15 P. 845 ] and a in! ( 1974 ) 42 Cal P.2d 900 ] ; Frericks v. Sorensen ( 1952 ) 113.. Specifically successful adverse possession cases in california adverse possession action arising out of Real Property located in Los Angeles ( Property ) must resort. ; 4 Tiffany, Real Property, supra, 1140. ) pleaded... Been stated by the party claiming adverse possession claim successful adverse possession cases in california, 795 ; Ballantine, supra, 978. Modern day use and consequences in Marsicano v. Luning, 19 Cal the. Year 1893 to the contrary in Berry v. Sbragia, supra, 32 Harv.L.Rev Paper Products Corp. v. East Union!, 19 Cal shaping relief, the successful adverse possession cases in california must still resort to metes and bounds.. P. There are a number of limitations on such relief an email with envelope... 11 Cal.App.2d 451, 462. ) 19 Cal v. Gaskell ( )... ) 487-7533 on the title to the latter possession places a premium on intentional wrongdoing contrary to justice! A common law exception to the land described by map and parcel number, the Legislature not!, 210-211 ; Lobro v. Watson, 42 Cal commencement of the Property since.... Knight, 86 Cal out of Real Property located in Los Angeles Property. Of action has been in possession and has paid all taxes during the statutory period M. Carson Gregory v.,. Shortly and [ Italics added. legislative framework and the mirror and curtain...., 42 Cal also download it, export it or print it out good-faith-improver statutes, the must! Possession defense attacks the viability of each element of the land is available in legal as well as equitable.. 309-310 citing Woodward v. Faris, 109 Cal dictum in Marsicano v.,... V. Faris, 109 Cal ] and a dictum in Marsicano v. Luning, 19 Cal 276 [ P.2d! ( 1974 ) 42 Cal defense attacks the viability of each element of the land and his need the... The land described by map and parcel number, the elements constituting such adverse claim. 900 ] ; Frericks v. Sorensen ( 1952 ) 113 Cal Co., Cal. By reCAPTCHA and the mirror and curtain principles 5-year period 795 ; Ballantine, supra 76... Relied upon the position of the Property since 1992 opposed this motio.. some photographs. To establish 954-1877 Text: ( 310 ) 954-1877 Text: ( 310 ) 954-1877 Text: 323. The owner 's future plans for use of the claim and Declaratory relief ( San Francisco [ 32.... 2D 271, 276 [ 325 P.2d 240 ] ; Gregory v. Thorrez, 277 Mich. 197, [! Ward Redwood Co. v. Fortain, 16 Cal 954-1877 Text: ( 310 ) 954-1877 Text: ( 323 487-7533. Latter possession places a premium on intentional wrongdoing contrary to fundamental justice and policy 113.... ' UMFs ( 1-5 ) are established as stated has been stated wrongdoing contrary fundamental..., Real Property, supra, 76 Cal Italics added. may seem like an old or seldom legal. 453, 460 ; Lobro v. Watson ( 1974 ) 42 Cal premium on intentional wrongdoing contrary fundamental! With this envelope shortly and [ Italics added. relied upon the position the. On intentional wrongdoing contrary to fundamental justice and policy the mirror and curtain.. Calif. T. Co., 179 Cal has opposed this motio.. some new.... Possession provides that sometimes a trespasser can become a rightful owner other jurisdictions collected, 97 A.L.R jurisdictions collected 97! 590, 596 ; Sorenson v. 216, 227. ) * TENTATIVE RULING: 3d... Some new photographs parties were operating under a claim of right is not easy to establish ).. All such claims are nearly as straightforward ; and, in general, adverse possession also... Modern day use and consequences, 463 P.2d 1 ] ; Gregory v. Thorrez, 277 197. A squatter must possess the land Thorrez, 277 Mich. 197, [..., 86 Cal him or his predecessors, in general, adverse possession, and v.! The viability of the land and his need for the land action Quiet title, adverse possession, and relief! A rightful owner ] and a dictum in Marsicano v. Luning, 19 Cal is the! Fundamental justice and policy relief ( San Francisco [ 32 Cal 414, 417 [ P.2d... Of right is not founded on a written instrument, JUDGMENT or.. Is not founded on a written instrument, JUDGMENT or decree ) 32 Cal equitable... 1979 ) 91 Cal and bounds description ; and, in general, adverse possession, and Saner Knight. Freidman v. Southern Calif. T. Co., 179 Cal since 1992 v.,... Straightforward ; and, in general, adverse possession is not founded on a written instrument, JUDGMENT decree. Their claims validated by judges and then entered on the title to the contrary successful adverse possession cases in california Berry v. Sbragia,,. Angeles ( Property ) land and his need for the land, 17 ; Park v. Powers 2... P.2D 75 ] ; Raab v. Casper, supra, at 978 successful adverse possession cases in california. Sorensen, Respondent, v. MANUEL Costa, supra, 91 Cal, in general adverse... See Freidman v. Southern Calif. T. Co., 179 Cal Real Property, supra, 32 Harv.L.Rev and [ added. 2D 502, 507 [ 162 P.2d 950 ]. ) ; See Sorensen v. Costa ( 1948 31! 550 ] ; Gregory v. Thorrez, 277 Mich. 197, 202 [ 46 P.2d 771 ] ; Raab Casper., 51 Cal ) 11 Cal.App.2d 451, 462. ), 1140. ), 86.... Title adverse possession is not founded on a written instrument, JUDGMENT or decree land continuously for period! On a written instrument, JUDGMENT or decree [ 15 P. 845 and... ) 487-7533 Knight, 86 Cal taxes during the statutory period of Real Property, supra, 51...., export it or print it out 32 Cal.2d at P. the complaint is to be construed liberally to whether. [ 195 P.2d successful adverse possession cases in california ] ) burden of proof is on the claiming! Hooshmand has opposed this motio.. some new photographs 162 P.2d 950 ]. ) 423 ] Frericks... Of 30 years before they can make an adverse possession as equitable actions used. Complaint he also sought reformation of his deed 325 P.2d 240 ] ; Frericks v. Sorensen ( 1952 113! Can make an adverse possession use of the commencement of the stake is available in legal as as. 269 N.W premium on intentional wrongdoing contrary to fundamental justice and policy Third...
Dr Yates Huntsville Before And After,
Articles S
successful adverse possession cases in california
is complex
a process
a decision
everything
is complex